|
|
Post by Vladik on Feb 4, 2005 18:42:40 GMT -5
Supreme Theft Auto (my project); a racing/action/fighting (sort of...)/rpg (somewhat...) game! I call it a RAFRPG.
|
|
|
|
Post by Simon on Feb 5, 2005 7:53:25 GMT -5
maybe i'll do another game. it will be more like, who wants to be a millionair ... with school question
that would be easy
|
|
|
|
Post by bfr on Feb 5, 2005 14:09:48 GMT -5
There are already many of those on ticalc.org. Also, I personally don't think that they are very fun, but maybe other people will. It is your choice.
What we need is a good RPG space game with changing bad guys with high speed, or something of the sort. But again, it is your choice, and maybe people will choose to download your version of "Who Wants to be a Millionare" out of the other 15 versions.
|
|
|
|
Post by Vladik on Feb 5, 2005 14:16:07 GMT -5
If you have played a lot of games, you would know that there are already a lot of calculator "space games" which are called shoot-em-ups and have NOTHING to do with RPGs.
Also, your "Who Wants to Be a Millionare" sounds good! (Remember that Simon has a 82, not a 86!).
It could have different categories that you could download, such as reading, spelling, math, social studies, science, geometry, calculus, literature, programming, technology, calculators, presidents, World War II, and much more.
If it is expertly programmed, it will suceed.
|
|
|
|
Post by bfr on Feb 5, 2005 14:22:16 GMT -5
I forgot that SImon had a ti-82.  |
|
|
|
Post by Vladik on Feb 5, 2005 14:23:04 GMT -5
Now you remember! ;D
|
|
|
|
Post by Simon on Feb 5, 2005 18:50:22 GMT -5
hey guys, do you know about earthbound and earthbound zero, that was the best rpg in the world (thats what I think)
it would be nice to create one like that, It was for the first nintendo
|
|
|
|
Post by Vladik on Feb 5, 2005 20:51:09 GMT -5
Earthbound?
|
|
|
|
Post by Simon on Feb 5, 2005 22:32:38 GMT -5
here is some screenshots super nintendo and just nintendo  %202.GIF) |
|
|
|
Post by Vladik on Feb 5, 2005 23:33:30 GMT -5
Interesting...
|
|
|
|
Post by bfr on Mar 8, 2005 20:32:24 GMT -5
What Vladik said.
|
|
|
|
Post by Pure on Mar 30, 2005 22:45:21 GMT -5
that was an unnecessary post. You should clearly state your OWN opinion...anyway, that's a cool screenshot...
|
|
|
|
Post by bfr on Oct 22, 2005 18:03:35 GMT -5
But what if I agree with him?
|
|
|
|
Post by Vladik on Oct 22, 2005 20:05:13 GMT -5
Well, you could say "I agree", and post something useful along with it...
|
|
|
|
Post by bfr on Oct 22, 2005 20:50:15 GMT -5
I guess you're right.
But you do the same thing!
...back on topic...
Do you think there should be a newer version of the TI-86, aka the TI-86+ or TI-86 Platimum?
I bet bcherry would say no.
|
|
|
|
Post by Pure on Oct 23, 2005 9:30:50 GMT -5
no, because the TI-86 is one-of-a-kind and it has been far too long since it has been made. There is no need for it with the new 68k calcs and the TI-84+ series. Along those lines, I saw a TI-86 at a comic/card shop yesterday during a Magic: The Gathering tournament.
|
|
