|
|
Post by Vladik on Mar 12, 2005 22:59:06 GMT -5
Talk about MLC in this section!
|
|
|
|
Post by bfr on Mar 13, 2005 19:49:41 GMT -5
mlc is pretty good, it is prettyt fast, and I'm looking foward to the new version. Too bad it takes up so memory though...
|
|
|
|
Post by Vladik on Mar 13, 2005 19:52:48 GMT -5
I am actually working on a BASIC phoenix-like!
It is currenly very fast; I could load some animated screens!
|
|
|
|
Post by bfr on Mar 13, 2005 19:58:10 GMT -5
In mlc? On your TI-85? I don't think that it has enough memory. Or is there mlc for the V200?
|
|
|
|
Post by Vladik on Mar 13, 2005 20:01:05 GMT -5
No. I said that it was in BASIC. And yes. On the Voyage 200 Personal Learning Tool.
|
|
|
|
Post by bfr on Mar 13, 2005 20:02:37 GMT -5
Well, it was in the "mlc" section and you program mlc using BASIC and an asm interpretor...
|
|
|
|
Post by Vladik on Mar 13, 2005 20:14:14 GMT -5
MLC has nothing to do with BASIC.
It has no similarities whatsoever.
|
|
|
|
Post by bfr on Mar 13, 2005 20:19:19 GMT -5
On-calc...
|
|
|
|
Post by Vladik on Mar 13, 2005 20:22:10 GMT -5
Thank you.
|
|
|
|
Post by CrimsonCasio on Mar 15, 2005 13:49:35 GMT -5
lol, well hi. im glad to see MLC is finding a nice home in the Ti community, I knew Casio programmers would love it but I admit I doubted that Ti people would be all that impressed (you all can use ASM libs in BASIC after all...). but now things seem to be taking off  (ive even got kv83 saying he wants to use MLC when it come out for the 83 models) ;D thanks for the support! and wish us luck! |
|
|
|
Post by bfr on Mar 15, 2005 18:01:44 GMT -5
I'm planning on making a form of mlc. Should I send it to you when I'm done? Also, I am also making an mlc-type thing except it usees a BASIC interpretor. Sad, huh.
|
|
|
|
Post by Pure on Mar 15, 2005 21:26:17 GMT -5
Yeah...lol. I'm gonna make a pure MLC [secret edited out] coming soon to a calc near you!** **Unless I win the Geography Bee!  , then I won't have time! |
|
|
|
Post by CrimsonCasio on Mar 16, 2005 12:21:31 GMT -5
I'm planning on making a form of mlc. Should I send it to you when I'm done? Also, I am also making an mlc-type thing except it usees a BASIC interpretor. Sad, huh. im not sure what you mean...? |
|
|
|
Post by bfr on Mar 16, 2005 18:44:57 GMT -5
im not sure what you mean...? I'm planning on making something that is similar to mlc that is in asm. Also, I'm making a programing language-type thing that uses a BASIC interpretor. I hope that clarified things. Also, please continue posting! |
|
|
|
Post by Vladik on Mar 17, 2005 18:11:09 GMT -5
Yeah...lol. I'm gonna make a pure MLC [secret edited out] coming soon to a calc near you!** **Unless I win the Geography Bee! , then I won't have time! A compiler? |
|
|
|
Post by bfr on Mar 18, 2005 21:18:51 GMT -5
In asm, right? (hopefully)
BASIC...is...OK....
|
|
|
|
Post by Vladik on Mar 18, 2005 21:27:07 GMT -5
Of course.
|
|
|
|
Post by Pure on Mar 23, 2005 22:29:56 GMT -5
duh in ASM. BASIC can't really do much with MLC...  |
|
|
|
Post by bfr on Nov 8, 2005 17:35:57 GMT -5
I just re-read the thread title. Isn't this whole board meant to discuss mlc?
MLC is really mostly focused on gaming.
|
|
|
|
Post by Vladik on Nov 8, 2005 18:18:15 GMT -5
Yes, and the good thing about MLC is that a, say, 86 game in MLC can be (eventually) played on the 89, with EVERYTHING STAYING THE SAME!
|
|
