|
Quantum
Mar 29, 2005 18:44:19 GMT -5
Post by Pure on Mar 29, 2005 18:44:19 GMT -5
Talk about quantum stuff here!
|
|
|
Quantum
Mar 29, 2005 18:57:29 GMT -5
Post by bfr on Mar 29, 2005 18:57:29 GMT -5
Well, quantums are very small ;D. Quantum mechanics and quantum physics are important; see THISNote: I'm known as Somebody in the Temporal-Reality community.
|
|
|
Quantum
Mar 29, 2005 19:05:11 GMT -5
Post by Pure on Mar 29, 2005 19:05:11 GMT -5
wasn't that the forum that kicked you off because you were 12?
|
|
|
Quantum
Mar 29, 2005 19:12:48 GMT -5
Post by bfr on Mar 29, 2005 19:12:48 GMT -5
Yeah ....
|
|
|
Quantum
Mar 29, 2005 19:15:42 GMT -5
Post by Pure on Mar 29, 2005 19:15:42 GMT -5
well, i'm thrrteen so HAH! ;D ;D ;D ... sorry...just kidding..24 posts till I catch Simon!
|
|
|
Quantum
Mar 30, 2005 20:45:09 GMT -5
Post by Vladik on Mar 30, 2005 20:45:09 GMT -5
You've caught him... ;D
|
|
|
Quantum
Mar 30, 2005 20:53:01 GMT -5
Post by bfr on Mar 30, 2005 20:53:01 GMT -5
Hmm..back to quantum stuff, according to some believers there is approximatelly 1/1,000,000,000,000,000 chance that you can go through a solid since the quantums are moving, do you all agree?
|
|
|
Quantum
Mar 30, 2005 21:07:19 GMT -5
Post by Vladik on Mar 30, 2005 21:07:19 GMT -5
No. If it were true, 9460.8 of the 6000000000 people on earth would experience this in their lifetime assuming that humans have an average life span of 50 years and a phasing can happen only once a second. If you also assume that there were generations and generations before dating back to the year 1000, you would see that this is impossible.
|
|
|
Quantum
Mar 30, 2005 21:15:20 GMT -5
Post by bfr on Mar 30, 2005 21:15:20 GMT -5
You might be right....
|
|
|
Quantum
Mar 30, 2005 21:38:38 GMT -5
Post by Pure on Mar 30, 2005 21:38:38 GMT -5
[glow=red,2,300][shadow=red,left,300]He is right[/shadow][/glow]
|
|
|
Quantum
Mar 30, 2005 21:53:43 GMT -5
Post by bcherry on Mar 30, 2005 21:53:43 GMT -5
Yeah, you've got it wrong. Maybe there is that chance that say, a bacterium could go through an ultrathin foil, but for a human to walk through a brick wall? We're talking 1/(the number of digits in pi) chance. And, it's "quanta", not "quantums".
|
|
|
Quantum
Mar 30, 2005 21:54:40 GMT -5
Post by Pure on Mar 30, 2005 21:54:40 GMT -5
eh...right...
|
|
|
Quantum
Mar 30, 2005 22:01:58 GMT -5
Post by bfr on Mar 30, 2005 22:01:58 GMT -5
bcherry bein himself
|
|
|
Quantum
Mar 30, 2005 22:22:04 GMT -5
Post by Pure on Mar 30, 2005 22:22:04 GMT -5
well, he is right even if he corrects us
|
|
|
Quantum
Mar 31, 2005 16:12:22 GMT -5
Post by bfr on Mar 31, 2005 16:12:22 GMT -5
Yeah...pretty much always.....
|
|
|
Quantum
Oct 22, 2005 8:34:47 GMT -5
Post by Pure on Oct 22, 2005 8:34:47 GMT -5
However, they are both right, in a sense, because the probability that bfr stated would be more applicable to a bacterium, as bcherry stated. But, if you were applying it to a human, the probability would be increased, in theory, by the mass of a human in relation to the mass of a bacterium. That means that, in someone's lifetime, somehow, they could have phased through an incredibly thin material.
|
|
|
Quantum
Oct 22, 2005 16:05:43 GMT -5
Post by Vladik on Oct 22, 2005 16:05:43 GMT -5
This material would not be felt by the person in question, whether or not the phasing is sucessful (I mean, one would be able to pass through the paterial by other, simpler means_. Chances are that even light would pass through the aforementioned material.
|
|