|
|
Post by bfr on Apr 2, 2005 9:46:54 GMT -5
Moderators: bcherry, protonpower89
(I will not be moderating this discussion because protonpower89 didn't moderate the other calc debate)
Discuss the given topic!
You should know the rules by now.
|
|
|
|
Post by Pure on Apr 2, 2005 11:55:46 GMT -5
HP makes clearly better calculators. I may be biased because I think that HP makes excellent products all around. My mom has an HP laptop. I have an HP All-in-one. But, HP calculators are better. Casio is releasing some new, better ones, but overall, HP is better.
|
|
|
|
Post by bfr on Apr 2, 2005 11:57:23 GMT -5
But then why are there so many Casio users?
|
|
|
|
Post by Pure on Apr 2, 2005 16:24:06 GMT -5
Well, Casio made calculators before HP, so many people have trouble leaving one brand.
|
|
|
|
Post by bfr on Apr 2, 2005 17:07:04 GMT -5
Yeah, but when people are comparing Casios and HPs you always here a whole bunch about Casios.
|
|
|
|
Post by Pure on Apr 2, 2005 17:08:11 GMT -5
my point exactly, people are more FAMILIAR with Casios.
|
|
|
|
Post by bfr on Apr 2, 2005 22:39:51 GMT -5
If you take the best Casio calc and take the HP calc, and try to do stuff on each calc, people say that the Casios work better.
|
|
|
|
Post by Pure on Apr 3, 2005 9:52:33 GMT -5
give me one example. They are probably comparing different types or something, like when they said HP was better than TI because the 49G+ was "better" than the TI-82! That's a horrible comparison!
|
|
|
|
Post by bfr on Apr 3, 2005 11:04:44 GMT -5
Maybe.
|
|
|
|
Post by Pure on Apr 3, 2005 11:47:42 GMT -5
HA!
|
|
|
|
Post by bfr on Apr 3, 2005 18:13:58 GMT -5
Well, that would mean that you won the debate, but I never said that Casio calcs were better....
|
|
|
|
Post by Pure on Apr 3, 2005 19:02:39 GMT -5
OK! Debate interval ONE! Up till now, vote for who won the debate! (separate poll)
|
|
|
|
Post by Vladik on Apr 4, 2005 17:55:44 GMT -5
The winner is evident...
|
|
