|
Post by Vladik on Jun 19, 2005 19:05:49 GMT -5
The new member groups are as follows.
Calc N00b - 0 (Posts) Amateur Coder - 50 BASIC Dabbler - 100 BASIC Master - 200 C Beginner - 300 C Mastermind - 450 ASM Starter - 750 ASM Overlord - 1000 Legendary Programmer - 1500 Living Legend - 2000
Questions, comments?
|
|
|
Post by Vladik on Jun 19, 2005 19:08:54 GMT -5
Hmm...
I just had a thought...
I'm gonna make it easier to advance ranks!
I'll post the modified post statistics here soon...
|
|
|
Post by Vladik on Jun 19, 2005 19:13:01 GMT -5
Calc N00b - 0 Amateur Coder - 20 BASIC Dabbler - 50 BASIC Master - 100 C Beginner - 150 C Mastermind - 250 ASM Starter - 400 ASM Overlord - 800 Legendary Programmer - 1300 Living Legend - 2000
There. But if you think that you are 1337 enough to go into the top ranks, then you must have the post count for it!
Oh, yeah. The stars go up, one by one...
|
|
|
Post by bfr on Jun 19, 2005 19:35:37 GMT -5
...then the admin is going to have...a LOT of stars.......
|
|
|
Post by Vladik on Jun 19, 2005 19:44:35 GMT -5
No. Same stars.
|
|
|
Post by bfr on Jun 20, 2005 11:34:53 GMT -5
10 stars?
|
|
|
Post by Vladik on Jun 20, 2005 20:59:17 GMT -5
Look at my miniprofile.
5 STARS!
|
|
|
Post by bfr on Jun 21, 2005 9:36:41 GMT -5
You said the stars go up one by one, and they are about 8 members groups!
|
|
|
Post by Pure on Jun 21, 2005 17:20:33 GMT -5
Vladik, you should put about six or seven stars for an admin, because a Living Legend will have more stars than an admin!
|
|
|
Post by Vladik on Jul 26, 2005 16:42:41 GMT -5
The stars for an admin are bigger and better, though!
|
|
|
Post by bfr on Jul 27, 2005 17:00:25 GMT -5
Yeah but it would still look weird if a MEMBER has 3 more stars than an ADMININSTRATOR.
|
|
|
Post by Pure on Jul 28, 2005 15:01:45 GMT -5
case in point
|
|
|
Post by Vladik on Jul 29, 2005 15:52:19 GMT -5
Hmm... I'll have to consider it.
|
|