|
|
Post by bfr on Apr 2, 2005 16:58:06 GMT -5
I'm serious about the HTML and the calcscript. AICL is the interpreted thing that is going to be in asm and is going to be in asm and is going to be sort of like mlc except it is better. What a long sentance. calcscript is supposed to be like javascript and I bet you all can guess what calc-HTML is like. I just finished making the underline tag, "<U>", for calc-HTML today. WSL is pretty useless and it is for people that can barely program in BASIC. WSL is an image and text-editing language. You will think it is even more ridiculous if I tell you all what "WSL" stands for.
|
|
|
|
Post by Pure on Apr 2, 2005 17:02:42 GMT -5
calc-HTML, eh?
|
|
|
|
Post by bfr on Apr 2, 2005 17:05:00 GMT -5
Yeah. C8-) 8-)l, huh? I'm serious: it is going to be like HTML version 2.0 or something like that.
It uses some cool BASIC programming....
|
|
|
|
Post by Pure on Apr 2, 2005 17:07:06 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by bcherry on Apr 2, 2005 17:16:59 GMT -5
WSL probably stands for "What a Stupid Language" right?
|
|
|
|
Post by Pure on Apr 2, 2005 19:40:48 GMT -5
heh, probably...  |
|
|
|
Post by bfr on Apr 2, 2005 22:35:56 GMT -5
It...well, if you REALLY want me to tell you all, tell me. But I'm not saying right now because you all will critisize it and, well you get the point....
|
|
|
|
Post by Pure on Apr 3, 2005 9:53:55 GMT -5
not me! I won't criticize it! *buys a book called "Criticism for DUMMIES"*
|
|
|
|
Post by bfr on Apr 3, 2005 10:55:56 GMT -5
WSL=Web Simulation Language
Not smart (I had to do that because of censoring), eh? But WSL is lilke HTML except syntaxes are different.
|
|
|
|
Post by Pure on Apr 3, 2005 12:27:41 GMT -5
i see
|
|
|
|
Post by AnyKey on Apr 4, 2005 21:48:57 GMT -5
Well, I wouldn't use it unless it had CSS!  What would be the point of this 'calc-script'? There are already text-editing apps out there. |
|
|
|
Post by bfr on Apr 4, 2005 22:31:05 GMT -5
Italics? Bold? Other cool stuff that is fast?
|
|
|
|
Post by Pure on Apr 6, 2005 15:23:27 GMT -5
unfortunately, yes...
|
|
|
|
Post by bfr on May 20, 2005 19:57:51 GMT -5
AICL IS GOING TO BE SO AWESOME!!!
It is sort of like "mlc" by EPS, except better....more commands.....
|
|
|
|
Post by Vladik on May 20, 2005 21:47:58 GMT -5
Okay, this would be a good time to say that AMS AMS emulation is useless, there is already a text editor for most (including the 86) calculators, and it would be extremely slow in basic.
|
|
|
|
Post by bfr on May 21, 2005 15:40:57 GMT -5
AICL:
- more commands
- made in asm
-not as good as TI-GCC, but getting there
A new version might be editable on the computer.
|
|
|
|
Post by Vladik on May 21, 2005 15:57:03 GMT -5
An on-calc AMS interpreter that doesn't take up the TI-86's measly memory?
|
|
|
|
Post by bfr on May 21, 2005 16:52:28 GMT -5
The new version shold be good. It wil probably be written in C or something like that,
|
|
|
|
Post by Vladik on May 21, 2005 21:45:26 GMT -5
For the TI-86?
|
|
|
|
Post by Pure on May 22, 2005 9:09:10 GMT -5
For something like this, it should be for more than one calc.
|
|
